Get the app

Acoustic properties · Resonance

Quality factor, decay and bandwidth

Does a longer ring always mean a larger Q?

Q describes energy retention per oscillation. Relating it to seconds of decay requires the mode’s frequency, while relating it to peak width requires a sufficiently isolated resonance.

Try the interactive demo

Start with something familiar

Two swings can lose a similar fraction of motion on every pass, yet one makes more passes each second. Q counts retention per cycle, so “rings for more seconds” and “has higher Q” are not identical statements.

Amplitude in time

Time →

f = 500 Hz · Q = 50 / 150

Peak width

Frequency →

Green: Q = 50 · Blue: Q = 150

Diagram · Higher Q gives a slower amplitude envelope and a narrower resonance when frequency is held equal. Neither graph alone is a finished-violin quality test.
  1. Notice what changes

    Compare the same frequency first. At the same starting amplitude, larger Q means slower envelope decay. The curve shows amplitude, not the instantaneous up-and-down waveform.

  2. Understand why

    Now keep Q fixed and increase frequency. More cycles happen each second, so the same per-cycle retention results in a shorter decay measured in seconds.

  3. Connect it to wood and making

    In a frequency scan, the same weakly damped isolated mode appears as a peak. Higher Q means a narrower normalized peak. Nearby modes and recording windows can obscure this relationship in real tests.

Put names to the ideas

01

Energy per cycle

For weak damping, Q is approximately 2π times stored energy divided by energy lost per cycle. It is dimensionless, and is not a general quality certificate for wood.

02

Envelope and logarithm

An isolated weakly damped mode has amplitude envelope A₀ exp(−πft/Q). Natural-log amplitude is a line with slope −πf/Q; a power or energy log needs a different factor.

03

Half-power is not half-amplitude

Q ≈ f₀/Δf uses the full width between the two half-power points. Their amplitudes are 1/√2 of the peak, about −3 dB, not one half of peak amplitude.

A(t)=A0e−πf0t/Q,τA=Qπf0,Q≈f0Δf−3dBA(t)=A_0e^{-\pi f_0t/Q},\quad \tau_A=\frac{Q}{\pi f_0},\quad Q\approx\frac{f_0}{\Delta f_{-3\mathrm{dB}}}

τA is the time for amplitude to fall to about 37% of its start, not to zero. Δf is the full width of the resonance at 0.707 of peak amplitude; these are two ways to describe the same ideal mode’s damping.

A worked example

At 500 Hz and Q = 100, the amplitude time constant is about 64 ms and the approximate bandwidth is 5 Hz. Doubling frequency at the same Q halves the time constant.

Explore it yourself

Adjust frequency and Q separately. Compare the normalized envelope with the resonance width; the plots are analytical teaching curves, not recordings.

TEACHING MODEL · LOCAL CALCULATION
τA
63.7 ms
Δf (−3 dB)
5.00 Hz
T60
0.44 s
A/A₀Time · 0–600 ms01
Normalized amplitude envelope. Same initial amplitude; a fixed 600 ms axis makes frequency and Q effects comparable.
A/Amaxf/f₀ · 0.8–1.201
Isolated-mode, weak-damping resonance approximation. Half-power amplitude is 0.707 of the peak.

Check your understanding

At fixed Q, doubling frequency does what to amplitude decay time?

References